Particularly important: There are no judicial proceedings before the Constitutional Court after proceedings have already been held before the Human Rights Chamber and vice versa

What is now regulated by the applicable Article 16, paragraph 4, item 12 of the Rules of the Constitutional Court – that the Constitutional Court is not competent to decide a case which had already been decided by the Human Rights Chamber – was the subject of heated discussions for a certain period of time. The same applies to the reverse, which means if the Human Rights Chamber receives a case which has already been decided by the Constitutional Court, it will not accept it. Unlike the Constitutional Court, which took an unambiguous point of view on this matter before amending its Rules, the Human Rights Chamber took more time to do so.