Skip to content

Although the former SFRY and RBiH had their respective constitutional courts, the BiH Constitutional Court, by its personnel composition, extensively set jurisdictions and substantive basis for constitutional control, constitutes a legal novum, a premise that applies to the entire BiH Constitution, as well as to the BiH Constitutional Court.2870 Apart from the continuity of the constitutional personality of Bosnia and Herzegovina, very few similarities with the previous republic Constitutional Court have persisted. Equating the rights of citizens to institute proceedings for constitutional control (actio popularis) before the former republic Constitutional Court with an individual constitutional appeal before the present day Constitutional Court was driven by an urge to give priority to the RBiH Constitution over the BiH Constitution in terms of legitimacy. “[Developed] protection and refined dogmatic of human rights and fundamental freedoms have never been virtues of the constitutional systems” of the former Yugoslav Republics.2871

The BiH Constitutional Court is a constitutional authority.2872 The jurisdictions thereof are explicitly stipulated in the BiH Constitution.2873 The BiH Constitutional Court, as a last instance in the interpretation of the BiH Constitution, shall have the final word in constitutional disputes arising between other constitutional authorities. Despite this, its “constitutional function”2874 does not include the right to expand its jurisdictions beyond the constitutional mandate. The mission of the BiH Constitutional Court to protect the BiH Constitution forces it at the same time to self-restriction. The BiH Constitutional Court carries a special burden of responsibility, notably that of deciding, in the last instance, the most important constitutional issues in BiH. This requires that the judges of the Court, being the highest in the judicial hierarchy, possess professional excellence, level-headedness, vision and judicial restraint.

The BiH Constitutional Court, by the force of the BiH Constitution, has a special place in the judiciary. It is part of judicial authority. The BiH Constitution does not stipulate solely its jurisdictions but bestows upon it authority to adopt its own “Rules of Procedure”. Due to the non-existence of the constitutional Framer’s order – which is present in other constitutions2875 – to regulate through law the procedure and organisation of the BiH Constitutional Court, this highest court in the State, regulates very thoroughly, in its Rules2876 and on its own, the constitutional missions referred to in Article VI of the BiH Constitution. Considering the aforementioned, one may speak of a dualist model of the judiciary of Bosnia and Herzegovina.2877 Certain structures of the so-called uniform model are recognisable solely in relation to the appellate jurisdiction of the BiH Constitutional Court. Namely, as an instance of review in individual cases, pursuant to Article VI.3(b) of the BiH Constitution, the BiH Constitutional Court discusses constitutional issues. However, ordinary courts are called upon to interpret and apply the BiH Constitution. Yet, one should emphasise that only the BiH Constitutional Court has powers to establish the unconstitutionality of a general act and to render such an act ineffective.2878


Footnotes

  1. Compare Article 122 and Chapter XIII of the RBiH Constitution from 1993, OG of RBiH, No. 5/93; as to the RBiH Constitutional Court see, also, Šarčević, 1996, p. 20.

  2. Statement made in Šarčević, 1996, Ibid. (“[E]in entwickelter Grundrechtsschutz und eine ausgefeilte Grundrechtsdogmatik [gehörten] niemals zu den Tugenden der Verfassungssysteme” der ehemaligen jugoslawischen Teilrepubliken;).

  3. The BiH Constitution does not carry out such a categorisation of State authorities. Instead, the BiH Constitutional Court itself assigns these attributes not only to the BiH Constitutional Court but also to the other authorities mentioned in the BiH Constitution (U 6/06, paragraph 28).

  4. Compare with, U 66/02.

  5. As specified in U 6/06, paragraph 22.

  6. Compare with, for instance, Article 94, paragraph 2 of the German Constitution (“Grundgesetz”).

  7. The first ever Rules of Procedure were adopted in 1997 (OG of BiH, No. 2/97) and have been amended on several occasions (OG of BiH, Nos. 16/99, 20/99, 26/01, 6/02 and 1/04). The revised text was published on two occasions, in 1999 and 2004 (OG of BiH, Nos. 24/99 and 2/04). Thereafter, the Constitutional Court of BiH adopted the new Rules of the Constitutional Court of BiH in 2005 (OG of BiH, No. 60/05), upon the entry into force of which the Rules of Procedure ceased to be applied. In the meantime, the Rules have also been amended several times (OG of BiH, Nos. 64/08 and 51/09)

  8. As to the single and dual system, compare with, Voßkuhle in: Mangoldt/Klein/ Starck, 1999, p. 987 et seq. See, also, allegations of the Constitutional Court of BiH in Case No. U 6/06, paragraph 26.

  9. Compare with, U 19/00, paragraph 19 et seq., paragraph 40; U 106/03, paragraph 33, as well as “b. Obligation to submit a request”, p. 867.

Share this page

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.