Judicial Review
Since ICTY arrest warrants are only issued after a decision of an ICTY judge assessing the evidence presented by the Prosecution, there seems to be consensus that additional judicial review at the domestic level of the evidence submitted to the judge in the ICTY in the proceedings for transferring the accused is not required.2524 However, considering the fact that the judicial review at the domestic level is basically limited to the question of whether the person to be transferred is in fact the person named in the indictment or arrest warrant respectively and the crimes charged fall under the jurisdiction of the ICTY, a more careful review at the domestic level might be preferable.
The Court of BiH, as the competent domestic Court to deal with the judicial review of transfers of persons accused by the ICTY,2525 has only been involved in one case of transferring an accused to the ICTY thus far, and, in the absence of relevant State level legislation regulating the procedure, applied Article II.8 of the Constitution directly,2526 in addition to quoting Security Council Resolution 827 (1993) as a basis for its order to immediately transfer the accused to the ICTY authorities.
Footnotes
Gallant, 1996, p. 372.
Given the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of BiH for war crimes, see Article 13(1) of the Law on the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Articles 170 – 203 of the Criminal Code of BiH and in relation to cases transferred by the ICTY, Article 2 (1) of the Law on Transfer.
Order of the Court of BiH of 9 June 2006 against Dragan Zelenović, X-EKS-06/218, who had been arrested in Russia and transferred to the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina on 8th June 2006.