Stalling or suspending the enforcement of the compensation for damage

AP 774/04 Runić et al.	20051220
CH/00/3615 et al.-Jotić et al.	20051109
CH/01/3615 et al.-Jotić	20051109
CH/01/8110-A&M	20030307
CH/01/8529 Marijanović	20030205
CH/02/12468 et al. Š. Kadrić et al. “War damage”	20050907
CH/97/104 et al.-A&M Todorović et al.	20021011
CH/97/48 et al. further legal remedies	20030704
CH/97/48 et al.-A&M Poropat et al.	20000609
CH/98/166-A&M Bjelonja	20030207
CH/98/375 et al.-Đ. Besarović et al.	20050406
CH/98/377 et al.-A&M Đurković et al.	20031107
CH/98/420 et al.-A&M Kugić et al.	20031010
CH/99/1613 et al. Š. B. et al.	20051214
U 14/05 N. Špirić “Old foreign currency savings”	20051202
U 57/01 35 members of the House of Peoples of the Parliament of Federation of BiH, et al.	20031220

The consequences of the armed conflict in BiH, taking into account the length of duration, scope and intensity of the war activities, are enormous. Many people are trying to obtain compensation for the damage they suffered, or to get with their existing and recognised damage compensation claims as far as fiscus. Oftentimes, the courts granted claims filed by plaintiffs. Nevertheless, the Entities opposed the enforcement and payment of damages determined by legally binding enforceable judgments, mainly in order to prevent the national treasury from going bankrupt.