Grounds
The broadest list of prohibited grounds of discrimination in any European or global treaty is to be found in the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. This Convention prohibits discrimination based on grounds “such as sex, race, colour, sex, language, religion or conviction, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, nationality, age, economic position, property, marital status, birth or other status”.2155 Many other instruments have most of these grounds and some refer to grounds which are not included amongst them, notably disability,2156 health2157 and association with a national minority.2158 One Convention even specifies that the applicable grounds or attributes can be those of the parent as much as the child affected by a measure.2159
However, more important perhaps is the question of whether the listing is illustrative or exhaustive. There are, of course, some treaties clearly limited to specific grounds of discrimination because that is their very focus, notably those concerned with gender, indigenous and tribal peoples and race, while those concerned with refugees and stateless persons only proscribe discrimination on account of race, religion or country of origin. Even those limited grounds might be wider than first thought. Thus the understanding of the term ‘race’ in one instrument2160 is defined to include not only colour and national or ethnic origin as mentioned above but also descent, and the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination has taken the view that identification of individuals as being members of a particular racial or ethnic group or groups shall, if no justification exists to the contrary, be based upon self-identification by the individual concerned.2161 It is probable that both approaches to defining race would be taken by the bodies responsible for interpreting this concept in other instruments. Indeed interpretation of itemised terms can widen their scope – ‘sex’, e.g., has been interpreted to cover ‘sexual orientation’2162 but more importantly most lists of grounds ensure that they are not exhaustive by prefacing them with the phrase ‘such as’ and ending with the reference to ‘other status’. Certainly the latter has been found to extend to age,2163 height,2164 past employment,2165 sexual orientation,2166 and could possibly extend to persons who are internally displaced2167 or even to those whose immigration status is irregular. In principle such lists are capable of extending to any group of persons with a shared attribute, inherent or chosen, and they should not, therefore, be construed too strictly.
Under European Union law the prohibited grounds of discrimination are generally limited to age, disability, gender, nationality, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief and sexual orientation. However, the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights seeks to prohibit discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation.2168 When the Charter enters into force it will operate as a constraint on measures adopted by European Union institutions and may be used in assessing the acceptability of various national implementing measures.
Footnotes
Article 7.
Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
The European Social Charter (Revised).
The ECHR and the European Social Charter (Revised).
Convention on the Rights of the Child.
The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.
General Recommendation No. 08: Identification with a particular racial or ethnic group (Article 1, paragraphs 1 and 4): 22/08/90.
UN H.R.Cttee., No. 488/1992, Toonen v. Australia, 31 March 1994.
UN H.R.Cttee., No. 983/2001, Love et al v. Australia, 25 March 2003.
UN H.R.Cttee., No. 854/1999, Wackenheim v. France, 15 July 2002; the case concerned dwarves.
ECtHR, Applications Nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, 27 July 2004.
ECtHR, Application No. 33290/96, Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal, 21 December 1999.
See Recommendation Rec(2006)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on internally displaced persons, paragraph 2.
Article 21.