Skip to content

In the further procedure on the examination of discrimination it should be established whether the unequal treatment is based on certain grounds, in other words whether it is based on a personal feature of the injured person (prospective victim of discrimination) such as: ethnicity, religion or language. The features listed in Article 14 of the ECHR are not itemised but rather they represent the most significant examples. This is clearly confirmed in the last part of the first sentence of Article 14 of the ECHR (“or other status”).2264 However, a person is unequally treated, which is legally relevant, only if a certain feature may be identified. Accordingly, in order to establish that there is discrimination it is not sufficient that a person claims, in general terms, that he/she is unequally treated without pointing to the grounds of inequality.2265 In its decisions, the BiH Constitutional Court has failed to clarify the grounds of discrimination, i.e., what feature of an injured person constitutes a basis for unequal treatment.2266 If unequal treatment is directly linked with one of the explicitly defined features in Article 14 of the ECHR, then a special burden of proof rests with the State that such treatment is justified.2267

Unequal treatment applied on the basis of essential features of individuals is found in the following cases: an administrative body does not allow a certain person to return to his/her pre-war apartment based on his/ her ethnic ground or origin, but the members of another ethnicity are allowed to do so;2268 a judicial body prevents a private prosecutor from conducting fair criminal proceedings because of his/her ethnicity;2269 during the armed conflict an employer puts only the employees of Bosniak or Croat ethnicity on the waiting list;2270 in a small area of the RS an administrative body gives an order to destroy only Bosniak and Croat houses;2271 a special regulation on repossession of the so-called JNA apartments, when compared to repossession of other apartments, constitutes differential treatment based on ethnic grounds;2272 deprivation of liberty for the purpose of the exchange of prisoners or forced labour or inhumane treatment on solely ethnic grounds;2273 deprivation of the right to equal protection before the court (Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights), in a way that the police authority failed to offer protection to an individual from the attack and insult of a third party;2274 the court guarantees a certain degree of social protection only to persons whose spouse died but denies that protection to persons who lived in factual informal marriage with their cohabiting partner who died;2275 creating quantitative difference with respect to the right to receive support from the spouse in proportion to his/her earnings.2276


Footnotes

  1. CH/97/76-A&M, paragraph 78. 2266 See, for instance, AP 98/03. 2267 CH/96/29-A&M, paragraph 156.

  2. CH/02/12226, paragraph 70.

  3. CH/98/756-A&M, paragraphs 70-88; CH/01/6979-A&M, paragraphs 71-74.

  4. CH/00/3834, paragraph 34 et seq.

  5. CH/03/12928, paragraph 51 et seq.

  6. CH/02/8202 et al., paragraph 188 et seq.

  7. CH/97/45-A&M, paragraph 92; CH/98/946-A&M, paragraph 130; CH/97/45-A&M, paragraphs 96, 100; CH/98/946-A&M, paragraph 130.

  8. CH/97/41-A&M, paragraph 65. In connection with the proceedings in Canton 10, compare also CH/01/6979-A&M, paragraph 72 et seq.; in these proceedings the Chamber could additionally rely on the opinion of the Federation of BiH according to which there was a problem in Canton 10 with regards to the efficiency and independence of judicial system (CH/98/756-A&M, paragraphs 70-88, and recommendation to see CH/01/6979-A&M, paragraph 71).

  9. CH/00/4094, paragraph 46 et seq.

  10. U 11/00.

Share this page

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.