Skip to content

The BiH Constitutional Court did not establish that there was a property within the meaning of Article 1 of Additional Protocol No. 1 to the ECHR in the following cases:

customs duties;1854

donation for reconstruction of a house, if there is no right to it but a decision is at the discretion of the administrative authority;1855

expropriated property;1856

confiscated property;1857

nationalised property;1858

compensation for damages in the case of dissolution of marriage concluded according to Shariat (the so-called mahr);1859

compensation for damage caused to property during the war if the alleged responsible person is not sued;1860

offer in the privatisation process1861 or auction;1862

taxes on revenue, sales tax;1863

■ right to restitution in accordance with a law supposed to be adopted;1864

priority right to purchase in the case of division of property according to the ownership portions;1865

precarious contract1866

list on the allocation of apartments: being put on the apartment allocation list (based on which socially owned apartments used to be allocated); the procedure for assessment of the candidate’s eligibility for putting him/her on the list;1867 request to declare the apartment allocation list null;1868

costs of utilities: garbage collection fee;1869

meal allowance off duty;1870

■ ownership and other property rights whose acquisition is at the discretion of administrative authorities (expectations of acquiring a land;1871 the employees’ expectations of acquiring shares in a company in the privatisation process;1872 the expectations of a JNA member who had an occupancy right that he would conclude a contract on the apartment purchase1873);

■ ownership and other property rights which the appellant could not prove during the proceedings (ownership;1874 compensation for expropriation;1875 a priority right to purchase a land, which ceased to exist;1876 the rights under the purchase pre-contract;1877 occupancy right;1878 heritage;1879 claim for damages;1880 claim for compensation for damages caused by inflation or denomination1881; compensation for military service;1882 pension;1883 compensation for performed work1884);

■ ownership and other property rights exercised without legal basis;1885 however, unlawfully acquired ownership1886 or lease,1887 fall under the scope of application1888 if the unlawfulness is based on an act of the competent authority, its failure to act or declaration;

■ ownership and other property rights which are allocated for temporary use;1889

■ ownership and other property rights which have been declared null in fair proceedings (declaration on nullity of a purchase contract;1890 declaration on nullity of a decision on restitution;1891 declaration on nullity of a lease contract1892);

confiscated property.1893


Footnotes

  1. AP 75/03, paragraph 21.

  2. AP 83/06, paragraph 5l.

  3. CH/02/8785, paragraph 19 et seq.

  4. U 61/02, paragraph 21; CH/03/13438, paragraph 15 et seq.

  5. AP 68/05, paragraph 37 et seq.; CH/03/13424, paragraph 49 et seq.; CH/01/8525, paragraph 11.

  6. Compare, U 62/01, paragraph 23 et seq.

  7. AP 742/04, paragraph 33 et seq.

  8. AP 365/04, paragraph 23; CH/03/14312, paragraph 31 et seq.

  9. AP 914/04, paragraph 14.

  10. AP 669/03, paragraph 8; AP 643/03, paragraph 23.

  11. CH/98/1040-A, paragraph 21; CH/03/9628-A&M, paragraph 92; CH/00/4863-A, paragraph 3 et seq.

  12. U 33/00, paragraphs 27, 31.

  13. U 11/02, paragraph 25.

  14. CH/00/7018, paragraph 10.

  15. CH/02/8791, paragraph 27 et seq.; AP 1419/05, paragraph 16.

  16. AP 1/03, paragraph 26.

  17. CH/00/4080, paragraph 17 et seq.

  18. CH/99/2627, paragraph 32 et seq.

  19. CH/01/7674-A, paragraph 19.

  20. CH/98/1169-A&M, paragraph 56 et seq.

  21. AP 91/02, paragraph 28; AP 983/04, paragraph 31.

  22. AP 1050/04, paragraph 26.

  23. U 3/01, paragraph 29.

  24. U 30/02, paragraph 31.

  25. AP 45/02, paragraph 84; AP 120/03, paragraph 32; U 43/03, paragraph 32; AP 959/04, paragraph 29.

  26. AP 1488/05, paragraph 29; U 65/02, paragraph 45; CH/02/8847, paragraph 8 et seq.; AP 1082/05, paragraph 7 et seq.

  27. U 72/03, paragraph 29.

  28. AP 162/05, paragraph 14 et seq.; AP 218/05, paragraph 18 et seq. See also U 30/01, paragraph 21; U 11/01, paragraph 22 et seq.

  29. AP 147/05, paragraph 30.

  30. CH/02/12994, paragraph 89; CH/99/2640, paragraph 8 et seq.

  31. AP 286/05, paragraph 11.

  32. CH/99/2628-A, paragraph 16.

  33. U 108/03, paragraph 34.

  34. U 14/03, paragraph 34.

  35. U 14/03, paragraph 33, with reference to the ECtHR, Pine Valley Developments Ltd. et al. v. Ireland, 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, paragraph 51, see also AP 561/04, paragraph 28.

  36. AP 497/04, paragraph 37.

  37. CH/02/11111, paragraph 21.

  38. AP 1236/06, paragraph 26.

  39. AP 393/04, paragraph 17; see also AP 2078/05, paragraph 42.

Share this page

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.