{"id":11935,"date":"2024-12-09T12:10:24","date_gmt":"2024-12-09T11:10:24","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-12-09T16:03:50","modified_gmt":"2024-12-09T15:03:50","slug":"ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/","title":{"rendered":"ii. Proceedings related to the \u201cdetermination\u201d of civil rights and obligations"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

AP 1029\/04 M. P.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050615<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1078\/05 \u201eSkr\u0161kopromet\u201c<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050615<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1086\/04 Geca<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20051202<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1129\/04 Plotan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20051117<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1151\/05 D. \u0106.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050713<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1199\/05 Inkometal AG<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060509<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1228\/05 Had\u017eiibrahimbegovi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060613<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1285\/05 Zlati\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060509<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1293\/05 \u201eKrivaja\u201c d.d.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060912<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1390\/05 Krasni\u0107i<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20051013<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1393\/05 V. D.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050713<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1489\/05 Bo\u0161njak<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060509<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1509\/05 \u0160akan et al<\/i>.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060920<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1570\/05 Hasi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20061109<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1641\/05 Kova\u010d<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060912<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1658\/06 \u201eVeletekstil\u201c d.o.o. Sarajevo<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060920<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1675\/05 Ke\u0161elj<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060613<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1918\/05 Tehnograd-Company<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20051013<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 1943\/07 Vran\u010di\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20070716<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 201\/05 B. K.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050713<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 240\/03 \u0110. M.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20040318<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 240\/06 Im\u0161irovi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20070419<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 2458\/05 \u201eCroatia osiguranje\u201c d.d.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060929<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 291\/03 A. S.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20040723<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 310\/04 E. S.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20041209<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 368\/04 F. B.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20040929<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 439\/04 Mili\u0107evi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060920<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 441\/06 H. A.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060313<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 479\/05 Tom\u0161i\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060509<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 533\/05 \u0160abi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060314<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 535\/06 Kremi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060412<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 551\/04 S. H.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050518<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 637\/04 A. K.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050722<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 726\/05 N. O.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050615<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 73\/02 Sanas<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20030725<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 743\/04 Ba\u0161agi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20051117<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 776\/06 Krasni\u0107i<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060412<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 79\/06 Remeti\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060314<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 84\/04 \u017d. B.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050323<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 854\/04 \u201eVilkom\u201c<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20041209<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 895\/05 Markovi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060209<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 90\/05 \u201eEtaeng Trading ltd\u201c<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050615<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AP 969\/04 Z. V.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050323<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/00\/5247 \u201eSarajevska pivara\u201c<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20061106<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/00\/5548 Pehli\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20050706<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/01\/7309 Kasumovi\u0107 AP 240\/06<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20061219<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/01\/8032 Ivani\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060206<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/01\/8112 et al<\/i>. D&M Joti\u0107 et al<\/i>.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20051109<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/01\/8304 Dervi\u0161evi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060913<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/01\/8393 Hifziefendi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20051005<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/02\/10738 Mrda<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20061220<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/02\/10757 et al<\/i>. J. R. et al<\/i>.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20070207<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/02\/12401 Kuduzovi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20070508<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/02\/8780 Sara\u010d<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20070509<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/03\/14064 et al<\/i>. Nikoli\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20070227<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/03\/14284-H. B.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20051106<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/03\/14363 Vukovi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20070626<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/03\/14958 Grabovac<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060913<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/97\/61-D Majstorovi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

19980722<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/98\/548-D Ivanovi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20000309<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/98\/638-D&M Damjanovi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20000211<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CH\/99\/1859-D&M Jeli\u010di\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20000211<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 13\/00 Croatian telecommunications<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20000929<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 16\/03 R. S.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20040317<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 20\/01 D\u017eananovi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20011012 OG of BiH, <\/i>No. 25\/01<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 21\/02 S. T.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20040326<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 24\/01 Krsti\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20020312 OG of BiH, <\/i>No. 05\/02<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 28\/01-2 Jugovi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20020312 OG of BiH, <\/i>No. 05\/02<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 31\/02 S. A.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20040326<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 40\/01 B. T.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20010831<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 5\/02 FMO \u2013 FBiH Army<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20040121<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 51\/01 Cantonal Prosecutor\u2019s Office in Sarajevo<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20020910 OG of BiH, <\/i>No. 25\/02<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 59\/01 Bi\u010dak\u010di\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20020829 OG of BiH, <\/i>No. 24\/02<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 60\/01 Garib<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20020829 OG of BiH, <\/i>No. 24\/02<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 61\/01 \u010covi\u0107<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20020829 OG of BiH, <\/i>No. 24\/02<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 63\/01 Z. I.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20060627<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

U 65\/02 D\u017e. A.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20031229 OG of BiH, <\/i>No. 43\/03<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR is applicable only to proceedings determining a person\u2019s \u201ccivil\u201d rights or obligations, or any criminal charge against a certain person.914 <\/sup><\/span>This is one of the essential requirements for the application of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR. In this respect, it is irrelevant whether proceedings are classified as civil or criminal by the domestic legal order. Actually, it is essential that the proceedings, under the substantive criteria, \u201cdetermine\u201d the \u201ccivil\u201d rights or obligations or any criminal charge. This may also be the case in proceedings, which, under domestic law, are not defined as civil but, for example, as administrative proceedings. However, the effect of such proceedings must have a sufficiently strong connection with the civil rights and obligations or ought not to have irrelevant effects on such rights and obligations but have to determine them directly. Therefore, the \u201ccivil\u201d rights or obligations must be the only or one of the relevant matters of the proceedings.915 <\/sup><\/span>In addition, the extent and manner to which Article 6 is applicable depends on the special features of the proceedings concerned and account must be taken of the entirety of the proceedings conducted under the domestic legal order.916 <\/sup><\/span>When perceived in such a fashion, any criminal charge filed against a person may be determined also in disciplinary proceedings, also by applying Article 6.917<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

Furthermore, the constitutional and legal review of the regularity of the proceedings may be conducted, as a rule, only once the court judgment completing certain proceedings has become legally binding.918 <\/sup><\/span>If an appellant, in general, complains of a violation of the right to a fair trial, the appeal shall be premature if the highest court passes the challenged decision and refers the case back to the lower court for renewed proceedings. In such a case, it is necessary that the proceedings as a whole are concluded.919 <\/sup><\/span>Consequently, an issue as to the fairness of the proceedings must be assessed based only on the proceedings as a whole.920 <\/sup><\/span>If the competent court decides only on the justification of the decision ordering detention for a certain person, the court does not decide on \u201cany criminal charge against him\u201d, within the meaning of the ECHR and, therefore, any reference to a violation of Article 6 of the ECHR is premature.921 <\/sup><\/span>If the appellant is actually never brought before the court i.e., put on trial, such proceedings are not relevant as to Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR.922 <\/sup><\/span>The same applies in the case of a subsidiary prosecutor where the State Prosecutor\u2019s Office discontinues the criminal proceedings against a certain person.923<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

In addition, a legally binding procedural or substantive partial decision in criminal proceedings does not fall within the ambit of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR. Thus, for instance, if the court first takes a final decision on the territorial jurisdiction of the court,924 <\/sup><\/span>or it decides on the real jurisdiction of an administrative body,925 <\/sup><\/span>the court does not decide, taking into account the proceedings as a whole, on the \u201ccivil\u201d rights or obligations, i.e., on any criminal charge, as the court decides only about the procedural requirements for further proceedings. Such proceedings do not come within the scope of Article 6 of the ECHR (incompatible ratione materiae).<\/p>\n

Likewise, the provisional decisions are excluded from the safeguards of Article 6 of the ECHR, given that those decisions, only temporarily and not finally, mostly pending a completion of the main issue, determine a \u201ccivil\u201d right or obligation i.e., any criminal charge. In general, these include proceedings on the interim measures,926 <\/sup><\/span>or proceedings on the interim safety measures.927 <\/sup><\/span>However, there are exceptions to this rule, which should encompass those cases wherein a provisional decision should produce permanent effects: in the case that a request for interim measures is not identical to the main request (and both have to be characterised as civil) and if damage, which may occur if the request for interim measures is dismissed, could not be redressed by a legally binding decision, then Article 6 of the ECHR safeguards the proceedings initiated upon a request for interim measures.928 <\/sup><\/span>Exceptionally, the Constitutional Court also applied Article 6 of the ECHR in Case No. AP 743\/04. This case concerns the reasonableness of the length of civil proceedings related to the decision on interim measures suspending the enforcement of the legally binding administrative decision granting repossession of the apartment.929 <\/sup><\/span>Likewise, the decision in criminal proceedings conducted upon a request for safety measures (which is of a civil nature) also falls within the scope of Article 6 of the ECHR.930<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

In cases where a certain decision affects a person\u2019s \u201ccivil\u201d rights or obligations only indirectly, such a decision does not fall within the scope of Article 6 of the ECHR. Thus, for instance, the proceedings related to the registration of certain legal data: U 20\/01: removal from the court register of the person authorised to represent the company; similarly, in case AP 1078\/05: the registration of the person authorised to represent the company; U 13\/00: the registration of transfer of ownership; AP 1489\/05: the registration of a dispute in the land books; AP 854\/04 and AP 441\/06: the registration of the ownership right in the land books;931 <\/sup><\/span>however, it is different in proceedings challenging the validity of one\u2019s registration in the land books where the relevant issue comes within the scope of Article 6 of the ECHR: AP 869\/04, paragraph 30); AP 1509\/05: the establishment of criteria for registration of the ownership right in the land books.<\/p>\n

Besides, Article 6 of the ECHR does not apply to proceedings related to the obtaining of evidence.932 <\/sup><\/span>Furthermore, if the criminal proceedings against a certain person are suspended as a consequence of amnesty declared for the criminal offence the accused person is charged with, such proceedings do not determine the justification of a criminal charge.933 <\/sup><\/span>As to the proceedings related to the recognition of a foreign judgment determining a person\u2019s civil rights, the Constitutional Court first denied that it related to proceedings determining one\u2019s civil rights or obligations within the meaning of Article 6 of the ECHR.934 <\/sup><\/span>Subsequently, the Court nevertheless corrected its legal position and concluded that Article 6 of the ECHR was applicable to the proceedings to recognise foreign judgments in case one\u2019s civil rights or obligations were determined by such judgments, although, strictly speaking, such proceedings do not concern the establishment but recognition of the already determined civil rights or obligations.935 <\/sup><\/span>This correction of the case-law is commendable as the exequatur proceedings are necessary for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Bosnia and Herzegovina, although these proceedings, per se, indeed, cannot be identified as the determination of a person\u2019s right but the determination of applicability of a foreign judgment in the country. Therefore, de facto it relates to the proceedings determining a person\u2019s civil rights or obligations, which have to comply with the standards of Article 6 of the ECHR. Next, although bankruptcy proceedings, per se, are not a civil \u201cdispute\u201d, such proceedings provisionally regulate the issue of the existence of these rights and, therefore, Article 6 of the ECHR should be applied.936<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

Any civil rights or obligations, or any criminal charges against a person are not decided in proceedings deciding the admissibility of a certain legal remedy. Consequently, a violation of Article 6 of the ECHR cannot be established in proceedings deciding the admissibility of a request for extraordinary review in a civil case937 <\/sup><\/span>or in a criminal case,938 <\/sup><\/span>which is concluded by a legally binding decision, as well as in the case of deciding the admissibility of a request to restore the original condition,939 <\/sup><\/span>or a request for renewed proceedings in a civil case940 <\/sup><\/span>or in a criminal case,941 <\/sup><\/span>or a petition to reopen\/to renew the proceedings in a criminal case.942 <\/sup><\/span>Nevertheless, where significant deficiencies have been identified, even a procedural decision on renewed criminal proceedings may be construed as the determination of the criminal charge in terms of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR, if the court conducted certain evidentiary proceedings and re-established the facts on the basis of new evidence and, actually, upheld once again the previous conviction and sentence.943 <\/sup><\/span>In this case, HRC for BiH departed from its case-law previously established in Case No. CH\/97\/61-D,944 <\/sup><\/span>which strictly relied on the jurisprudence of the European Court. The Chamber upheld such an approach, which is apparently more contemporary than the jurisprudence of the European Court, and, in another case, it publicly deviated from the Strasbourg case-law.945 <\/sup><\/span>Furthermore, Article 6 of the ECHR does not apply to proceedings deciding a petition for the protection of legality, and not only because such proceedings relate to the decision on admissibility of a legal remedy but because an injured party, i.e., a right holder or a holder of the obligation, is entitled only to an initiative and is not entitled to pursue the legal remedy. A decision to pursue a legal remedy is left to the discretion of the competent public Prosecutor\u2019s Office.946 <\/sup><\/span>The same applies to the inspection proceedings where an individual, also, is entitled only to an initiative and cannot demand that the proceedings be instituted. Besides, in inspection proceedings, the rights of the person who requested the inspection proceedings are not decided but rather those of the third party obligations (for example, an obligation to pull down an unlawfully erected brick fence). However, the inspection proceedings may help a party damaged by the third party\u2019s acts or failure to act. Yet, the rights of an injured party are not decided in such proceedings.947 <\/sup><\/span>In addition, the court decision asserting that the court is not competent to decide the relevant matter does not determine a civil right or obligation, or any criminal charge.948 <\/sup><\/span>Nevertheless, in case the legal remedies are declared admissible by the relevant decision and that the competent authority re-determines the civil right or obligation, or the criminal charge, such a decision falls within the ambit of Article 6 of the ECHR.949<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

Article 6 of the ECHR is not applicable if the proceedings are discontinued and not completed by a decision on the merits, as, for instance, in cases where the criminal proceedings are discontinued as a result of a statute of limitations for criminal prosecution950 <\/sup><\/span>or in case the proceedings are terminated.951 <\/sup><\/span>Only under exceptional circumstances and if there are strong indications that a fault in the proceedings at an earlier stage cannot be remedied at a later stage, may the proceedings be examined before their conclusion in respect of a possible violation of Article 6 of the ECHR.952 <\/sup><\/span>The Constitutional Court has found such an exception in cases Nos. U 59\/01, U 60\/01 and U 61\/01, which all carried political weight. In the mentioned cases, the appellants addressed the Constitutional Court at an earlier stage, complaining of a violation of Article 6 of the ECHR and claiming immunity against criminal prosecution.953<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

A decision on a civil right or obligation, or a criminal charge, in terms of Article 6, paragraph 1 ECHR, in certain cases, may also be taken in the course of the enforcement proceedings related to the legally binding court judgment (by which a civil right or obligation, or a criminal charge has already been determined).954 <\/sup><\/span>Otherwise, in the case that the protection of Article 6 of the ECHR was completely excluded from the enforcement proceedings, the guarantees given in the course of the decision-making process would often have no effect.955 <\/sup><\/span>In fact, the enforcement proceedings are an integral part of the proceedings on the merits. However, under the European Court\u2019s case-law and the case- law of the former European Commission for Human Rights, this conclusion is applicable only if it is claimed that the enforcement proceedings have exceeded a reasonable time,956 <\/sup><\/span>as well as in the case that a civil right or obligation, or any criminal charge in terms of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR is re-determined in the course of enforcement proceedings.957 <\/sup><\/span>The meaning of redetermination is to be assessed on the basis of specific features of each individual case. At any rate, Article 6 of the ECHR is not applicable to the enforcement proceedings going through their normal course of development, including, also, any possible difficulties, such as, for instance, in the case of a blocked account of the debtor,958 <\/sup><\/span>in the case of a debtor\u2019s insolvency,959 <\/sup><\/span>or where the enforcement court ordered the payment of a debt instead of the sale of a debtor\u2019s property.960 <\/sup><\/span>Also, in the opposite case, i.e., where the economic situation is changed in favour of a creditor, a debtor does not enjoy the protection of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR.961 <\/sup><\/span>Contrary to these cases, the civil rights, which have already been determined by a final decision, are re-determined in enforcement proceedings within the meaning of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR, if the executive or legislative authorities, by enacting the law, prevent or postpone indefinitely the enforcement of legally binding court judgments against the budget.962 <\/sup><\/span>In such cases, the legislative authorities must strike a fair balance between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual\u2019s fundamental rights.963 <\/sup><\/span>The legislature must be particularly watchful of situations where, in this manner, third-party rights and interests are involved, such as, for instance, in the case of the sale of marital property of a debtor964 <\/sup><\/span>or in the case of the sale of a third-party property which includes the debtor\u2019s share.965 <\/sup><\/span>The third situation where Article 6 of the ECHR applies to enforcement proceedings \u2013 apart from a breach of the reasonable time requirement in enforcement proceedings and redetermination \u2013 the Constitutional Court views as the arbitrary application of laws.966<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

The proceedings instituted upon request for renewed criminal proceedings for the purpose of pronouncing a flat sentence of imprisonment in accordance with legally binding judgments, constitute an entirety together with the proceedings in which criminal liability was determined and a single sentence was pronounced, i.e., such proceedings constitute part of the \u201cdetermination\u201d and, therefore, the principles of the right to a fair trial are guaranteed in such proceedings.967<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

If the appellant, before the Constitutional Court, challenges a procedural decision taken in inheritance proceedings<\/b>, the appellant, for the purpose of applying Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR, must prove that the relevant proceedings concerned a dispute over the civil right and the determination thereof. As to this issue, the case-law of the highest courts varies. Firstly, the objective of inheritance proceedings does not have to be the determination of an issue in terms of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR. The challenged factual or legal issues may be the subject matter of parallel civil proceedings, the outcome of which may be significant for the very inheritance proceedings.<\/p>\n

In such a case, both proceedings must be regarded in their entirety, which may be subject to review in appellate proceedings before the Constitutional Court.968 <\/sup><\/span>If the appellant failed to avail himself of the civil proceedings to resolve an issue disputable in respect of the inheritance proceedings, a procedural decision taken in inheritance proceedings is insufficient in order for Article 6 of the ECHR to be applicable since the relevant proceedings did not dispute i.e., determine a civil right.969 <\/sup><\/span>The same may be concluded in respect of the proceedings instituted for the purpose of obtaining a supplementary decision on inheritance.970 <\/sup><\/span>Contrary to the said case-law, the Constitutional Court, in Case No. AP 1129\/04, declared the appeal admissible and decided on the merits of the case, which also related to the inheritance proceedings challenged for an alleged violation of the rights protected under Article 6 of the ECHR.971 <\/sup><\/span>In Case No. 1675\/05, the Constitutional Court declared the appeal, lodged against the procedural decision on inheritance, manifestly ill-founded for the appellant\u2019s failure to refer to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to ECHR, but the Constitutional Court did not declare it inadmissible ratione materiae. The Human Rights Commission within the Constitutional Court of BiH regarded inheritance proceedings as the proceedings that may give rise to an issue related to civil rights within the meaning of Article 6 of the ECHR, namely, whether or not a person has a right to inherit.972<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

Starting from its linguistic meaning, Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR guarantees the fair trial rights of the accused. Therefore, protection afforded by Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR does not extend to proceedings initiated by a person against a third party or to a request filed to a public Prosecutor\u2019s Office to initiate such proceedings.973 <\/sup><\/span>Consequently, Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR does not guarantee the right to a fair trial of third parties \u2013 or of an injured party, his\/her relatives (in the capacity of subsidiary prosecutors) or of the public \u2013 in the context of the requirement that the accused must be justly punished or that the accused, because of the faults of the proceedings or an arbitrary decision, must not be exempted from criminal liability. It follows that Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR does not afford protection against a court decision by which a person is absolved from criminal liability in an arbitrary manner. According to this case-law, an appellant, who is a relative of an injured party, claiming in the appeal that he\/she was unlawfully denied the right to participate effectively in the criminal proceedings in the capacity of a subsidiary prosecutor, cannot claim a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR.974 <\/sup><\/span>Namely, these types of cases do not concern the determination of a \u201ccriminal charge\u201d of an injured party or of his\/her relative (within the meaning of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR), but they concern only the accused and, therefore, the guarantees of Article 6 of the ECHR are applicable only to the accused.975 <\/sup><\/span>Consequently, a victim tortured by police officers has no possibility, under Article 6 of the ECHR or other protected rights enumerated in Annex 6 of GFAP, to complain against apparent irregularities made in favour of the accused.976 <\/sup><\/span>Moreover, Article 6 of the ECHR does not apply to an injured party even where domestic law provides a victim with the right to participate in criminal proceedings as an injured party, since this is not a right guaranteed by the ECHR, but by domestic law.977 <\/sup><\/span>However, it is different where a decision on justification of a charge against a person is, in terms of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR, at the same time, decisive for a civil claim of a third party, for instance, of an injured party\u2019s claim or his\/her relative\u2019s compensation claim against a perpetrator of a crime.978 <\/sup><\/span>Judges of Human Rights Chamber for BiH Masenko-Mavi, Grasso and Aybay disagreed with the majority opinion according to which an injured party, i.e., a victim does not enjoy any protection under Article 6 of the ECHR. In their view, the injured party must enjoy the guarantees of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR because an injured party (a victim), according to the domestic law, in fact, joins the criminal prosecution as a party entitled to compensation for the injury caused by the crime at issue. In other words, in these types of proceedings, the \u201ccivil rights\u201d are being determined within the meaning of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR.979 <\/sup><\/span>Yet, the impossibility to protect a victim against arbitrary decisions of criminal courts, in terms of the guarantees of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the ECHR, is alleviated by the fact that the protection is afforded by other provisions of the ECHR. Namely, such a case would relate to a breach of the right to respect for family life of a victim\u2019s close family member980 <\/sup><\/span>and a breach of the right prohibiting inhuman treatment.981<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

AP 1029\/04 M. P. 20050615 AP 1078\/05 \u201eSkr\u0161kopromet\u201c 20050615 AP 1086\/04 Geca 20051202 AP 1129\/04 Plotan 20051117 AP 1151\/05 D. \u0106. 20050713 AP 1199\/05 Inkometal AG 20060509 AP 1228\/05 Had\u017eiibrahimbegovi\u0107 20060613 AP 1285\/05 Zlati\u0107 20060509 AP 1293\/05 \u201eKrivaja\u201c d.d. 20060912 AP 1390\/05 Krasni\u0107i 20051013 AP 1393\/05 V. D. 20050713 AP 1489\/05 Bo\u0161njak 20060509 AP 1509\/05 … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":11933,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-11935","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nii. Proceedings related to the \u201cdetermination\u201d of civil rights and obligations - Commentary on BiH Constitution<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ii. Proceedings related to the \u201cdetermination\u201d of civil rights and obligations - Commentary on BiH Constitution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"AP 1029\/04 M. P. 20050615 AP 1078\/05 \u201eSkr\u0161kopromet\u201c 20050615 AP 1086\/04 Geca 20051202 AP 1129\/04 Plotan 20051117 AP 1151\/05 D. \u0106. 20050713 AP 1199\/05 Inkometal AG 20060509 AP 1228\/05 Had\u017eiibrahimbegovi\u0107 20060613 AP 1285\/05 Zlati\u0107 20060509 AP 1293\/05 \u201eKrivaja\u201c d.d. 20060912 AP 1390\/05 Krasni\u0107i 20051013 AP 1393\/05 V. D. 20050713 AP 1489\/05 Bo\u0161njak 20060509 AP 1509\/05 … Read more\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Commentary on BiH Constitution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-12-09T15:03:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/app\/uploads\/2024\/12\/flags.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"686\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/\",\"name\":\"ii. Proceedings related to the \u201cdetermination\u201d of civil rights and obligations - Commentary on BiH Constitution\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-09T11:10:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-09T15:03:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Article II \u2013 Human rights and fundamental freedoms\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"C. Obligation to directly apply the ECHR (Article II.2 of the BiH Constitution)\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"The right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the ECHR)\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":5,\"name\":\"The general right to a fair trial (Article 6 paragraph 1 of the ECHR)\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":6,\"name\":\"Conditions of Application\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":7,\"name\":\"ii. Proceedings related to the \u201cdetermination\u201d of civil rights and obligations\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/\",\"name\":\"UstavBiH.ba\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#organization\",\"name\":\"UstavBiH.ba\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/app\/uploads\/2024\/12\/flags.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/app\/uploads\/2024\/12\/flags.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":686,\"caption\":\"UstavBiH.ba\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ii. Proceedings related to the \u201cdetermination\u201d of civil rights and obligations - Commentary on BiH Constitution","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ii. Proceedings related to the \u201cdetermination\u201d of civil rights and obligations - Commentary on BiH Constitution","og_description":"AP 1029\/04 M. P. 20050615 AP 1078\/05 \u201eSkr\u0161kopromet\u201c 20050615 AP 1086\/04 Geca 20051202 AP 1129\/04 Plotan 20051117 AP 1151\/05 D. \u0106. 20050713 AP 1199\/05 Inkometal AG 20060509 AP 1228\/05 Had\u017eiibrahimbegovi\u0107 20060613 AP 1285\/05 Zlati\u0107 20060509 AP 1293\/05 \u201eKrivaja\u201c d.d. 20060912 AP 1390\/05 Krasni\u0107i 20051013 AP 1393\/05 V. D. 20050713 AP 1489\/05 Bo\u0161njak 20060509 AP 1509\/05 … Read more","og_url":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/","og_site_name":"Commentary on BiH Constitution","article_modified_time":"2024-12-09T15:03:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":686,"url":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/app\/uploads\/2024\/12\/flags.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/","url":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/","name":"ii. Proceedings related to the \u201cdetermination\u201d of civil rights and obligations - Commentary on BiH Constitution","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-09T11:10:24+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-09T15:03:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/ii-proceedings-related-to-the-determination-of-civil-rights-and-obligations\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Article II \u2013 Human rights and fundamental freedoms","item":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"C. Obligation to directly apply the ECHR (Article II.2 of the BiH Constitution)","item":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"The right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the ECHR)","item":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"The general right to a fair trial (Article 6 paragraph 1 of the ECHR)","item":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":6,"name":"Conditions of Application","item":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/article-ii-human-rights-and-fundamental-freedoms\/c-obligation-to-directly-apply-the-echr-article-ii-2-of-the-bih-constitution\/the-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-of-the-echr\/the-general-right-to-a-fair-trial-article-6-paragraph-1-of-the-echr\/conditions-of-application\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":7,"name":"ii. Proceedings related to the \u201cdetermination\u201d of civil rights and obligations"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/","name":"UstavBiH.ba","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#organization","name":"UstavBiH.ba","url":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/app\/uploads\/2024\/12\/flags.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/app\/uploads\/2024\/12\/flags.jpg","width":1920,"height":686,"caption":"UstavBiH.ba"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11935","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11935"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11935\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12523,"href":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11935\/revisions\/12523"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11933"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustavbih.ba\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11935"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}